He warned that the ruling could undermine rights to contraception and gay marriage: вЂњThis is an extreme and dangerous path.вЂќ The Supreme CourtвЂ™s three most liberal members argued that the majority decision вЂњbreaches a core rule-of-law principle, designed to promote constancy in the lawвЂќ and вЂњplaces in jeopardyвЂќ other rights.ДЄt the White House, President Joe Biden pledged to do everything in his power to defend a womanвЂ™s right to have an abortion in states where it will be banned. вЂњIвЂ™m very concerned about where this is going to go.вЂќ вЂњItвЂ™s all interconnected, because at its base, birth control and abortion are both types of health care that help people have bodily autonomy,вЂќ said Mara Gandal-Powers, director of birth control access for the National WomenвЂ™s Law Center, which supports abortion rights. Lawmakers in Idaho and Missouri last year discussed banning state funding for emergency contraception, and Idaho prevents public schools or universities from dispersing it. Some abortion opponents treat some forms of contraception as forms of abortion, particularly IUDs and emergency birth control such as Plan B, also known as the вЂњmorning afterвЂќ pill. Who knows? Maybe interracial marriage, birth control,вЂќ Nazir said. вЂњTheyвЂ™re going to go for LGBTQ rights first and then same-sex marriage next. She wore a pink cowboy hat festooned with a button featuring a вЂњcowboy uterusвЂќ drawing for a вЂњVote NeighвЂќ campaign against an anti-abortion measure on the statewide ballot Aug. including Rija Nazir, a 21-year-old community organizer from Wichita for a voting-rights group. The possibility worried some of the scores of people at a Friday evening abortion-rights rally outside the Kansas Statehouse in Topeka. and opposition to specific kinds of birth control on the right have advocates concerned that those rights are vulnerable. Still, a sharp increase in anti-LGBTQ rhetoric in the U.S. The Obergefell decision that legalized same-sex marriage was based on equal protection, and hundreds of thousands of couples have relied on it to wed, a precedent that many courts would be loath to disturb. Other factors could protect those rulings on birth control and LGBTQ rights, too. вЂњIf there is a thought that this could apply elsewhere, you know, theyвЂ™re not going to say it here, and weвЂ™re just going to have to see,вЂќ Dupont said.

Still, said Paul Dupont, a spokesman for the conservative anti-abortion American Principles Project, conservatives are optimistic about the potential for future victories on cultural issues, though getting more states to ban abortion is вЂњa huge enough battle.вЂќ

Kristen Waggoner, legal director for the Alliance Defending Freedom, which helped defend the Mississippi abortion law at issue in the ruling, said the high courtвЂ™s decision makes it clear that вЂњthe taking of human life is unlike any other issue.вЂќ She said raising other issues shows the weakness of criticsвЂ™ arguments about abortion.

вЂњNothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.вЂќ вЂњAnd to ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right,вЂќ Alito wrote. Some argued that the case did not have implications beyond that, noting AlitoвЂ™s words. вЂњToday is about this horrifying invasion of privacy that this court is now allowing, and when we lose one right that we have relied on and enjoyed, other rights are at risk,вЂќ said Jim Obergefell, the plaintiff in the landmark ruling legalizing same-sex marriage, who is now running as a Democrat for the Ohio House.ДЄbortion opponents celebrated the potential for states to ban abortion after nearly 50 years of being prevented from doing so. Germany's Scholz: No apology for reporter snubbed at G7

John thomas white pages california